Hyundai Kona N
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-30
Crossover · Gasoline
Hyundai Kona N
Car A
Hyundai Kona N
The Hyundai Kona N blends quick acceleration with the everyday usefulness of a five-seat compact. Strong reliability and safety signals support good value in its segment, though efficiency and cargo space are only middling.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety280 hp
Mazda CX-30
Car B
Mazda CX-30
The Mazda CX-30 delivers good value in its segment by balancing efficiency, usable performance, and top safety. It suits compact-family and city use, backed by a reliability score of 85 and five safety stars.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 67 / 71
City 50 / 56
Budget / value 62 / 72
Road trip 48 / 50
Performance 29 / 28
Cargo 27 / 31
Practical 49 / 54
Premium 27 / 22
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Hyundai Kona N · Orange = Mazda CX-30

Specs side-by-side

Spec Hyundai Kona N Mazda CX-30
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Hyundai Kona N

  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.5 s and 280 hp make merging and passing easy
  • Five seats and a 361‑liter trunk suit everyday family‑compact errands
  • Strong reliability and safety signals support low‑stress ownership
  • At 34,900, it reads as good value in its segment for performance‑minded shoppers

Mazda CX-30

  • Five-star safety and an 85 reliability score for peace of mind
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 combined consumption
  • Lively daily performance: 186 hp and 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s
  • Practical compact-family fit with 430 L trunk and 5 seats

Verdict

Pick Hyundai Kona N if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Hyundai Kona N is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Mazda CX-30 if…
Performance & capability
Mazda CX-30 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons