Mazda CX-3 Touring vs Mazda CX-30

Mazda CX-3 Touring

Crossover · Gasoline

Mazda CX-30

Crossover · Gasoline

Car A

Mazda CX-3 Touring

The Mazda CX-3 Touring offers good value in its segment for city driving, combining a 5-star safety rating and an 85 reliability score with efficient 6.1 combined consumption. Its 264 L trunk and 150 hp are modest, making it less ideal for cargo-heavy use or performance-focused buyers.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.1 L/100km

Car B

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 delivers good value in its segment by balancing efficiency, usable performance, and top safety. It suits compact-family and city use, backed by a reliability score of 85 and five safety stars.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety186 hp

Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatssame usage profile

Usage fit

Family 65 / 71

City 69 / 56

Budget / value 73 / 72

Road trip 36 / 50

Performance 24 / 28

Cargo 21 / 31

Practical 51 / 54

Premium 16 / 22

Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-3 Touring · Orange = Mazda CX-30

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-3 Touring Mazda CX-30

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons