Hyundai Kona Hybrid
Crossover · Hybrid
vs
Mazda CX-3 Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Hyundai Kona Hybrid
Car A
Hyundai Kona Hybrid
The Hyundai Kona Hybrid emphasizes low running costs and everyday practicality for city commutes and small families. It trades outright speed and cargo space for efficiency and a solid safety standing in its class.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safety5.1 L/100kmHybrid
Mazda CX-3 Touring
Car B
Mazda CX-3 Touring
The Mazda CX-3 Touring offers good value in its segment for city driving, combining a 5-star safety rating and an 85 reliability score with efficient 6.1 combined consumption. Its 264 L trunk and 150 hp are modest, making it less ideal for cargo-heavy use or performance-focused buyers.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety150 hp
Why compared same body typesame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 67 / 65
City 70 / 69
Budget / value 71 / 73
Road trip 46 / 36
Performance 28 / 24
Cargo 27 / 21
Practical 53 / 51
Premium 16 / 16
Winter 28 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Hyundai Kona Hybrid · Orange = Mazda CX-3 Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Hyundai Kona Hybrid Mazda CX-3 Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Hyundai Kona Hybrid

  • Efficient for its class at 5.1 L/100 km.
  • Good value in its segment around 25,000.
  • Smooth city drivability from 265 Nm and 9.9 s 0–100 km/h.
  • Small-family practicality: 5 seats, 361 liters of trunk space.

Mazda CX-3 Touring

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Reliability score of 85
  • Efficient for its class (6.1 combined consumption)
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 22000

Verdict

Pick Hyundai Kona Hybrid if…
Best fuel economy
Hyundai Kona Hybrid uses 5.1 L/100km vs 6.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-3 Touring if…
More power
Mazda CX-3 Touring puts out 150 hp vs 141 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons