Subaru WRX S4
Quick verdict
The fast answer firstThe Subaru WRX S4 blends AWD traction and strong turbo performance with five-seat practicality, offering good value in its segment. It’s quick and 5-star safe, though 9.6 L/100 km fuel use may not suit economy-focused buyers.
Quick reference
A fast read on where this car fitsNot sure yet? Consider these options
Who this car is best for
Best fit and tradeoffsBest for
- Drivers needing extra confidence in colder conditions
- Families wanting a useful daily car
- Budget-led buyers trying to stretch value
- Drivers wanting a balanced day-to-day car
Less ideal for
- People carrying bulkier loads more often
- Buyers prioritizing a more upscale feel
- Large families needing 7 seats
- Buyers prioritizing the very lowest fuel costs
Key specs
At a glanceShould you choose the Subaru WRX S4?
A practical buyer-focused readWhy choose it
- Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.1 s with 275 hp and 400 Nm
- AWD grip for confident year-round driving
- 5-star safety rating
- Room for five and a 460 L trunk suit growing families
Why skip it
- Combined consumption of 9.6 L/100 km if low running costs are a priority
- 460 L trunk may not cover cargo-heavy use
- Reliability score of 75 may not satisfy top-tier dependability seekers
- Not aimed at premium shoppers
Where this fits in the Subaru lineup
Useful brand contextWhere this car stands out
Good entry points to explore related pagesExplore next
Compare, browse and go deeperSimilar Subaru alternatives
Cross-brand competitors
Best use case comparisons
Subaru WRX S4 in more detail
More detailed contextBalanced performance and utility
The WRX S4 combines AWD with a 2.0L turbocharged boxer for confident pace, while seating for five and a 460 L trunk keep it practical for growing families and road trips.
It offers good value in its segment at about 30,000, backed by a 5-star safety rating.
Who will like it
Drivers prioritizing horsepower, acceleration, and all-weather traction who still need everyday usability.
Trade-offs to note
Fuel use of 9.6 L/100 km won’t suit economy-first buyers, and the trunk size limits cargo-heavy routines.
A reliability score of 75 may not meet top-dependability expectations, and it isn’t positioned for premium-focused shoppers.