Mazda CX-50
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Nissan Murano
Crossover · Gasoline
Mazda CX-50
Car A
Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 blends family-friendly space, a 5-star safety rating, and a reliability score of 80 with good value in its segment. Its 186 hp and 8.1 s 0–100 km/h deliver confident everyday performance without chasing sport credentials.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety8.6 L/100km
Nissan Murano
Car B
Nissan Murano
The Nissan Murano blends family-ready space, 5-star safety, and usable performance at a price that’s good value in its segment. It suits growing families and road trips without chasing premium frills or track-day speed.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety249 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 82 / 85
City 52 / 37
Budget / value 65 / 60
Road trip 61 / 76
Performance 27 / 28
Cargo 52 / 66
Practical 59 / 59
Premium 23 / 32
Winter 34 / 38

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-50 · Orange = Nissan Murano

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-50 Nissan Murano
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-50

  • 5-star safety rating for strong protection
  • Reliability-first ranking with a score of 80
  • Roomy 810 L cargo and five-seat practicality
  • Good value in its segment at 27,000

Nissan Murano

  • 5-star safety rating for added reassurance
  • 1050 L cargo space supports growing families and road trips
  • 0–100 km/h in 7.4 s makes merging and passing easy
  • $32,500 pricing is good value in its segment for a 249 hp, 5-seat SUV

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-50 if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-50 uses 8.6 L/100km vs 9.6 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Nissan Murano if…
More power
Nissan Murano puts out 249 hp vs 186 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons