Mazda MX-30 PHEV
Crossover · Electric · AWD
vs
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Mazda MX-30 PHEV
Car A
Mazda MX-30 PHEV
A city-focused plug-in with AWD, the Mazda MX-30 PHEV delivers efficient-for-its-class running and everyday usability at a good value in its segment. Just note the modest acceleration and missing safety/reliability data.
5 seatsCrossoverElectric1.5 L/100kmAWDElectric
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Car B
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
The Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring balances strong safety and reliability with city-friendly efficiency at a price that offers good value in its segment. Its compact practicality favors everyday urban use over cargo-heavy or high-performance needs.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety150 hp
Why compared different powertrainsame body typesame brandsame seats

Usage fit

Family 37 / 65
City 72 / 67
Budget / value 53 / 70
Road trip 29 / 36
Performance 29 / 26
Cargo 27 / 21
Practical 42 / 50
Premium 16 / 16
Winter 22 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda MX-30 PHEV · Orange = Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda MX-30 PHEV Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda MX-30 PHEV

  • Very low official combined consumption (1.5) if you charge regularly
  • AWD adds traction for varied road conditions
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a 366 L trunk for daily tasks
  • Priced at 33,900, it’s good value in its segment

Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Reliability score of 85
  • Efficient for its class (6.8 combined)
  • Well-suited to city driving and compact-family use

Verdict

Pick Mazda MX-30 PHEV if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda MX-30 PHEV uses 1.5 L/100km vs 6.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring if…
More power
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring puts out 150 hp vs 145 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons