Mazda CX-70
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Hyundai Kona N
Crossover · Gasoline
Mazda CX-70
Car A
Mazda CX-70
The Mazda CX-70 blends brisk performance with generous cargo space, making it well-suited to families that haul. It’s good value in its segment with efficiency that’s reasonable for its class.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline
Hyundai Kona N
Car B
Hyundai Kona N
The Hyundai Kona N blends quick acceleration with the everyday usefulness of a five-seat compact. Strong reliability and safety signals support good value in its segment, though efficiency and cargo space are only middling.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety8.4 L/100km280 hp
Why compared more powerbetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 54 / 67
City 32 / 50
Budget / value 45 / 62
Road trip 25 / 48
Performance 27 / 29
Cargo 56 / 27
Practical 47 / 49
Premium 9 / 27
Winter 8 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-70 · Orange = Hyundai Kona N

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-70 Hyundai Kona N
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-70

  • Huge 870 L cargo area for bulkier loads
  • Strong 250 hp and 420 Nm for confident pulling
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 6.5 s for easy merging
  • Good value in its segment around 35,000

Hyundai Kona N

  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.5 s and 280 hp make merging and passing easy
  • Five seats and a 361‑liter trunk suit everyday family‑compact errands
  • Strong reliability and safety signals support low‑stress ownership
  • At 34,900, it reads as good value in its segment for performance‑minded shoppers

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-70 if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Mazda CX-70 is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Hyundai Kona N if…
More power
Hyundai Kona N puts out 280 hp vs 250 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons