Mazda CX-3 Sport
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Honda HR-V LX
Crossover · Gasoline
Mazda CX-3 Sport
Car A
Mazda CX-3 Sport
The Mazda CX-3 Sport delivers good value in its segment with 5-star safety, solid reliability, and city-friendly manners. It’s efficient for its class and quick enough for daily driving, though cargo space is limited.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.9 L/100km148 hp
Honda HR-V LX
Car B
Honda HR-V LX
The Honda HR-V LX focuses on reliability and safety for growing families, offering a roomy 5-seat cabin and a generous 688 L cargo area with good value in its segment. Performance is modest, making it better for commuting and family duty than spirited driving.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety
Why compared more reliablecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 64 / 79
City 67 / 54
Budget / value 70 / 70
Road trip 36 / 56
Performance 23 / 26
Cargo 21 / 45
Practical 48 / 59
Premium 15 / 22
Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-3 Sport · Orange = Honda HR-V LX

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-3 Sport Honda HR-V LX
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-3 Sport

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Good value in its segment at 21000
  • Efficient for its class (6.9 combined consumption)
  • Reliability score of 80

Honda HR-V LX

  • Generous 688 L cargo space supports family and practical use.
  • Signals emphasize reliability and safety for peace of mind.
  • Good value in its segment at a price of 22,700.
  • Reasonable efficiency for daily commuting (combined consumption 7.5).

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-3 Sport if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-3 Sport uses 6.9 L/100km vs 7.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda HR-V LX if…
Reliability edge
Honda HR-V LX scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons