Honda Fit 2015
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Mazda3 2.0
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Honda Fit 2015
Car A
Honda Fit 2015
The 2015 Honda Fit emphasizes everyday usability and efficiency at a sensible price, making it a practical pick for budget-focused city driving. With seating for five and a sizable cargo area, it fits growing families without excess cost or complexity.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Mazda3 2.0
Car B
Mazda3 2.0
A well-rounded compact with good value in its segment, the Mazda3 2.0 blends strong safety and reliability with efficient day-to-day performance. Best for city and compact-family use, less ideal for cargo-heavy needs.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km150 hp
Why compared alternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 68 / 64
City 73 / 61
Budget / value 75 / 72
Road trip 30 / 40
Performance 30 / 29
Cargo 25 / 19
Practical 55 / 53
Premium 14 / 22
Winter 20 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda Fit 2015 · Orange = Mazda3 2.0

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda Fit 2015 Mazda3 2.0
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda Fit 2015

  • Good value in its segment at 16000 with efficient 6.8 L/100 km consumption
  • Five seats and a 450 L trunk support family duties and errands
  • City-friendly performance from a 1.5L I4; 0–100 km/h in 9.5 s is adequate for commuting
  • Aligns with priorities of reliability and safety for daily use

Mazda3 2.0

  • Strong reliability score (85) with 5-star safety reassurance
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km
  • Lively everyday performance (0–100 km/h in 8.2 s)
  • Good value in its segment around 22,000

Verdict

Pick Honda Fit 2015 if…
Lower entry price
Honda Fit 2015 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mazda3 2.0 if…
More power
Mazda3 2.0 puts out 150 hp vs 130 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons