Honda Fit 2008
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Mazda3 2.0
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Honda Fit 2008
Car A
Honda Fit 2008
A practical, good-value FWD 5-seater that ranks strongly for reliability, offers a large 590 L cargo area, and returns efficient 6.6 L/100 km fuel use—well suited to city driving and growing families. Modest power and FWD traction limits make it less appealing for spirited driving or harsh winters.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety
Mazda3 2.0
Car B
Mazda3 2.0
A well-rounded compact with good value in its segment, the Mazda3 2.0 blends strong safety and reliability with efficient day-to-day performance. Best for city and compact-family use, less ideal for cargo-heavy needs.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km150 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatssame usage profilestrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 65 / 64
City 74 / 61
Budget / value 75 / 72
Road trip 29 / 40
Performance 30 / 29
Cargo 33 / 19
Practical 58 / 53
Premium 10 / 22
Winter 16 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda Fit 2008 · Orange = Mazda3 2.0

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda Fit 2008 Mazda3 2.0
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda Fit 2008

  • Strong reliability signal for lower-stress ownership
  • Large 590 L trunk supports family errands and gear
  • Efficient for its class at 6.6 L/100 km combined
  • Good value in its segment at $14,900

Mazda3 2.0

  • Strong reliability score (85) with 5-star safety reassurance
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km
  • Lively everyday performance (0–100 km/h in 8.2 s)
  • Good value in its segment around 22,000

Verdict

Pick Honda Fit 2008 if…
Lower entry price
Honda Fit 2008 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mazda3 2.0 if…
More power
Mazda3 2.0 puts out 150 hp vs 100 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons