Ford Puma Titanium
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-5 Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Ford Puma Titanium
Car A
Ford Puma Titanium
Practical and easy to live with for growing families, the Ford Puma Titanium pairs five-seat flexibility with a roomy 456 L boot and brisk everyday pace. At 28,000, it offers good value in its segment for city-focused commuting and weekend duties.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.2 L/100km
Mazda CX-5 Touring
Car B
Mazda CX-5 Touring
The Mazda CX-5 Touring blends a 5‑star safety rating, a solid reliability score, and a generous 875 L cargo area to suit growing families at a price that’s good value in its segment. Performance and efficiency are tuned for everyday use rather than performance driving.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety194 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price

Usage fit

Family 70 / 85
City 69 / 51
Budget / value 70 / 64
Road trip 40 / 62
Performance 25 / 28
Cargo 32 / 56
Practical 55 / 61
Premium 17 / 24
Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma Titanium · Orange = Mazda CX-5 Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma Titanium Mazda CX-5 Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Titanium

  • Efficient for its class at 5.2 L/100 km, easing fuel costs
  • 456 L cargo space suits strollers, sports gear, and weekend bags
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s helps with urban merges and overtakes
  • Safety and reliability are highlighted strengths in its positioning

Mazda CX-5 Touring

  • 5-star safety and a reliability score of 82 support stress-free family use
  • 875 L cargo space fits family gear and road‑trip luggage
  • 194 hp with 8.6 s 0–100 km/h is confident for merging and passing
  • Price of 28,500 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma Titanium if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma Titanium uses 5.2 L/100km vs 8.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-5 Touring if…
More power
Mazda CX-5 Touring puts out 194 hp vs 155 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons