Ford Edge Titanium
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-5 Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Ford Edge Titanium
Car A
Ford Edge Titanium
A practical five-seater with strong power and a very large 1110 L cargo area, the Ford Edge Titanium fits growing families and long trips. Efficiency isn’t its headline, but space and everyday performance are.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety250 hp
Mazda CX-5 Touring
Car B
Mazda CX-5 Touring
The Mazda CX-5 Touring blends a 5‑star safety rating, a solid reliability score, and a generous 875 L cargo area to suit growing families at a price that’s good value in its segment. Performance and efficiency are tuned for everyday use rather than performance driving.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety8.7 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 84 / 85
City 36 / 51
Budget / value 55 / 64
Road trip 73 / 62
Performance 28 / 28
Cargo 69 / 56
Practical 59 / 61
Premium 34 / 24
Winter 38 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Edge Titanium · Orange = Mazda CX-5 Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Edge Titanium Mazda CX-5 Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Edge Titanium

  • Huge 1110 L cargo capacity suits growing families and road trips
  • 250 hp and 380 Nm provide confident everyday performance
  • 0–100 km/h in 7.2 s supports quick merges and passes
  • Safety is flagged as a strength in this model’s profile

Mazda CX-5 Touring

  • 5-star safety and a reliability score of 82 support stress-free family use
  • 875 L cargo space fits family gear and road‑trip luggage
  • 194 hp with 8.6 s 0–100 km/h is confident for merging and passing
  • Price of 28,500 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Edge Titanium if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Ford Edge Titanium is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Mazda CX-5 Touring if…
Performance & capability
Mazda CX-5 Touring is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons