Chevrolet Equinox RS
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-5 2.0L
Crossover · Gasoline
Chevrolet Equinox RS
Car A
Chevrolet Equinox RS
The Chevrolet Equinox RS leans on safety, reliability, and generous cargo space to serve growing families well. It’s efficient for its class and offers good value in its segment, though outright performance is modest.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety170 hp
Mazda CX-5 2.0L
Car B
Mazda CX-5 2.0L
A well-rounded family SUV that emphasizes reliability and safety while staying efficient for its class. Offers good value in its segment with usable performance and a practical 506 L trunk.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.9 L/100km
Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profile

Usage fit

Family 79 / 73
City 51 / 55
Budget / value 63 / 70
Road trip 60 / 54
Performance 28 / 26
Cargo 46 / 35
Practical 57 / 56
Premium 24 / 23
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Chevrolet Equinox RS · Orange = Mazda CX-5 2.0L

Specs side-by-side

Spec Chevrolet Equinox RS Mazda CX-5 2.0L
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Chevrolet Equinox RS

  • 5-star safety rating for peace of mind
  • Reliability score of 81 supports low-hassle ownership
  • 700 L trunk suits strollers, sports gear, and road-trip luggage
  • Price near 30,500 offers good value in its segment

Mazda CX-5 2.0L

  • High reliability score (85) with 5-star safety
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100 km
  • Good value in its segment around 26,000
  • Practical 506 L trunk and 5-seat layout for growing families

Verdict

Pick Chevrolet Equinox RS if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Chevrolet Equinox RS is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Mazda CX-5 2.0L if…
Reliability edge
Mazda CX-5 2.0L scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons