Mazda CX-60 3.3 D vs BMW X5 xDrive30d

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

Suv · Diesel

BMW X5 xDrive30d

Suv · Diesel · AWD

Car A

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

The Mazda CX-60 3.3 D balances torque-rich performance, family-ready space, and a 5-star safety rating while staying efficient for its class. It’s a good value in its segment if you prioritize economy and practicality over outright speed.

5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety6.1 L/100km272 hp

Car B

BMW X5 xDrive30d

A spacious AWD diesel SUV that balances family practicality with long-distance efficiency. Best for growing families and road trips rather than dense city use or performance driving.

5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safetyAWD

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 66 / 78

City 48 / 32

Budget / value 43 / 53

Road trip 57 / 76

Performance 33 / 35

Cargo 40 / 44

Practical 44 / 58

Premium 30 / 59

Winter 36 / 80

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 3.3 D · Orange = BMW X5 xDrive30d

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 3.3 D BMW X5 xDrive30d

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

Efficient for its class at 6.1 L/100km
Strong 600 Nm torque and 272 hp for confident passing
570 L cargo space suits growing families and road trips
5-star safety rating
0–100 km/h in 8.5 s won’t satisfy performance-focused drivers
Seats five only, limiting flexibility for larger families
Diesel powertrain may not suit buyers preferring petrol or hybrid
At 45,000, some will compare against entry-level premium options

BMW X5 xDrive30d

Efficient for its class with a combined consumption of 6.5 (diesel)
650-liter trunk and five seats suit growing families and luggage-heavy trips
AWD traction adds confidence in winter and on mixed roads
Good value in its segment at around 59,000 considering size and torque
Large SUV and diesel powertrain are less suited to short, stop-start city driving
Only five seats; no third row for bigger families
Not aimed at performance driving; prioritizes comfort and efficiency over sharp handling
The 59,000 price may not fit tighter budgets

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 3.3 D if…

Best fuel economy

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D uses 6.1 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick BMW X5 xDrive30d if…

All-wheel drive

BMW X5 xDrive30d's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

BMW X5 xDrive30d

Verdict

Related comparisons