BMW X3 xDrive30e
Suv · Hybrid · AWD
vs
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Suv · Phev
BMW X3 xDrive30e
Car A
BMW X3 xDrive30e
The BMW X3 xDrive30e blends SUV practicality with plug-in efficiency, delivering AWD assurance and space for a growing family. It offers good value in its segment if you want electric commuting with petrol flexibility, but it isn’t built for performance driving or cargo-heavy duty.
5 seatsSuvHybrid5-star safetyAWDHybrid
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Car B
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
The Mazda CX-60 PHEV blends efficient-for-its-class running costs with strong performance and five-star safety, making it a solid fit for growing families. With a 570 L trunk and a 0–100 km/h time of 5.8 s, it delivers good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvPhev5-star safety1.5 L/100km327 hpPlug-in hybrid
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 76 / 66
City 51 / 53
Budget / value 63 / 51
Road trip 59 / 54
Performance 34 / 28
Cargo 38 / 40
Practical 61 / 48
Premium 52 / 30
Winter 76 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = BMW X3 xDrive30e · Orange = Mazda CX-60 PHEV

Specs side-by-side

Spec BMW X3 xDrive30e Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

BMW X3 xDrive30e

  • Efficient plug-in hybrid: up to 50 km EV range and 2.4 combined consumption.
  • AWD traction for winter and variable weather.
  • Family-friendly space: 5 seats and a 550 L boot.
  • Balanced output (292 hp, 420 Nm) for confident everyday driving.

Mazda CX-60 PHEV

  • Efficient for its class (1.5 combined) to keep running costs low
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.8 s for confident merging and overtakes
  • 570 L cargo space and five seats for family flexibility
  • Five-star safety rating adds reassurance

Verdict

Pick BMW X3 xDrive30e if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
BMW X3 xDrive30e is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Mazda CX-60 PHEV if…
More power
Mazda CX-60 PHEV puts out 327 hp vs 292 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons