Audi Q2 40 TFSI
Crossover · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Mazda CX-70
Crossover · Gasoline
Audi Q2 40 TFSI
Car A
Audi Q2 40 TFSI
The Q2 40 TFSI combines AWD assurance and brisk 204 hp performance with fuel use that’s efficient for its class. Five seats and a 405 L trunk make it a solid fit for compact-family and city duties.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.7 L/100kmAWD
Mazda CX-70
Car B
Mazda CX-70
The Mazda CX-70 blends brisk performance with generous cargo space, making it well-suited to families that haul. It’s good value in its segment with efficiency that’s reasonable for its class.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline250 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 67 / 54
City 55 / 32
Budget / value 64 / 45
Road trip 54 / 25
Performance 30 / 27
Cargo 29 / 56
Practical 51 / 47
Premium 46 / 9
Winter 74 / 8

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi Q2 40 TFSI · Orange = Mazda CX-70

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi Q2 40 TFSI Mazda CX-70
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi Q2 40 TFSI

  • AWD traction adds confidence in wet and winter conditions
  • Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km
  • Strong acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.4 s) for confident overtakes
  • Practical five-seat layout with a 405 L trunk for daily errands

Mazda CX-70

  • Huge 870 L cargo area for bulkier loads
  • Strong 250 hp and 420 Nm for confident pulling
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 6.5 s for easy merging
  • Good value in its segment around 35,000

Verdict

Pick Audi Q2 40 TFSI if…
Best fuel economy
Audi Q2 40 TFSI uses 5.7 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-70 if…
More power
Mazda CX-70 puts out 250 hp vs 204 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons